Today I’ve been sitting in doing bugger all, except reading a beginner’s guide to aesthetics, which I know nothing about. Even now, after I’ve read half of it. It says something about my intelligence that I can’t even grasp a beginner’s guide to basic philosophy – I always finish these things with a sense of only having mentally scraped the surface of the content. Nonetheless, the bits that I do understand I find very interesting. Even if I could explain them, I wouldn’t do it here, as I’m trying to avoid becoming the pretentious fuckwit that I seemed destined to be. I want to have read these things motivated only by a thirst for knowledge – a desire which is fairly apathetic at the best of times, meaning I never actually get anything read – rather than the urge to immediately reiterate it to others with the hope of impressing them. Now that I’ve officially given in and become dead inside, and began to once again pursue the medicine career under social pressure, I need to study the subjects which interest me in my own time.
It seems that at this point in my life the schools of thought which are most relevant to me are hedonism, aestheticism and narcissism. It just seems like it’s the right time for me, in my adolescence, to say ‘fuck it’ to conventional principles of what is valuable in life and set off on a rampant pursuit of pleasure, paying no regard to my inevitable self-destruction.
That would be wonderful, I think, but it’s unrealistic. It’s too late. My habits and principles have already been formed – I am set in my ways. I am unrelentingly conscientious, driven by a unquenchable desire to ‘succeed‘ (which, I suppose, at this age is synonymous with good grades and sensible behaviour), probably derived from society’s expectations of any child who shows a hint of academic aptitude. As a result, I’ve been subject to it for most of my life. The thing is, I’m not intelligent. Well, no more or less intelligent than the next person. I recently took the UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) which is now obligatory for all applicants to UK medical schools. It’s basically an IQ test, designed to make selection easier, since the course has so many more applicants than the universities are able to accommodate, all of whom are high-achievers, which makes it difficult to differentiate between them. 80% of people who apply in Scotland have 5A’s in their Highers in 5th year, which is one more than the required AAAAB, and the most that 5th years in public school are allowed to take. Hence, academic merit is not enough – according to undergraduate prospectuses, candidates must have ‘non-academic’ qualities (work experience, etc.), be 18 or over, and, now, presumably, have a fairly high score on this test. I took an extra subject last year, which means I have six A’s, which is my edge. Despite this, however, I scored fairly average (which is poorly, for me) on the UKCAT, which may be my downfall. I deliberately didn’t try out any practice cognitive ability questions apart from those provided by the official website in order to familiarise candidates with the layout of the exam, as it is, after all, an intelligence test, and according to the website no further preparation can be done, as their is no syllabus on which they can provide questions.
It’s bollocks, of course – they only want people to take the test equally unprepared so as to make selection easier. You can certainly find similar types of questions and tutor your brain into the optimum processes for answering them, but due to the combined factors of my laziness and desire to ruin every one’s expectations of myself, I did none of this. And I scored average. Which, I feel, accurately reflects my intellectual ability. I work hard, and I get good grades. You don’t NEED to be bright to pass highschool exams. It’s just a matter of memorising the syllabus, which takes effort, but not intelligence.
So, because when I was 8-years-old I was perhaps slightly more advanced intellectually then my peers, I set the standard for myself for the rest of my academic life, and am expected by society to live up to it, despite the fact that my peers have long since caught up with and, in many cases, surpassed me in intelligence. One of my pet hates is that when I get a lower mark than usual on a test, or someone in the class beats me, everyone acts so surprised. ‘I beat LAURA! Oh my God!!!’ or, ‘A B?! Laura got a B?!’ It annoys the shit out of me. I’m not competitive – I’m really not peeved if I get beaten by people in a subject. I don’t have a lot of self-confidence and normally I don’t expect to do as well as I do, my recent exam results being a good example. So yes, I’m glad that you got a better mark than me, I’m happy for you, but must you use me as a constant standard of intelligence? I’m here by my own choice, my own work, and I can just as easily not be here if I want to, if it weren’t for the constant fear of disappointing people and the urge to live up to their expectations. I should be able to do whatever the fuck I want.
So, really, the choice isn’t mine, and this returns me to my earlier point. I will always be the hard-working, ’successful,’ person. There’s no place in society for me if I discard all my money-making potential in favour of making the most of life. I’ll never have promiscuous sex or do recreational drugs, or develop an all-consuming substance addiction, because deep down, I’m the person everyone wants me to be. In all seriousness, I’ll probably end up in an unhappy marriage with children I don’t, and will never, want, and work over-time until said marriage breaks up, just like my Dad, and wake up one day when I’m 45 and realise I’ve missed out on everything in life, by which time it will be too late to change my priorities. Basically, I’ll become everything I don’t want to be.
In that respect, I think I’m like Lord Henry from Dorian Gray (speaking of aesthetics), who, throughout the entire novel spouts scandalous rhetoric about The New Hedonism, and criticises conventional morality, but never seems to express these principles in his own actions, or really do anything but attend dinner-parties. I am a hypocrite, the most hated type of person in society. But I like the hypocrite, because he is everyone, really. The reason people resent hypocrites so much is because when they look at them they see their personal qualities mirrored. As in the preface of the previously mentioned novel, a.k.a. the greatest book ever written in the history of the universe (because it’s the only book I’m able to understand); “The 19th century dislike of realism is the rage of Caliban seeing his own face in the glass.”